Verify the source data
We build each comparison from product specifications and supporting sources that can be checked. If a factor cannot be supported confidently, we do not pretend it is known.
GymVerity turns verified specifications and practical buying factors into category-specific scores, while keeping the underlying evidence visible so the number never has to stand on its own.
The Verity Score is designed to make product trade-offs easier to understand. We compare products within the same category, score the factors that matter for that category, and keep raw specifications alongside the result wherever possible.
We build each comparison from product specifications and supporting sources that can be checked. If a factor cannot be supported confidently, we do not pretend it is known.
A treadmill is not judged like an adjustable dumbbell or a protein powder. The dimensions and weighting are chosen for the product category being compared.
The overall score is paired with dimension scores, tables and radar charts so you can see why two products with similar totals may suit very different buyers.
For treadmills, the current framework uses six dimensions. Each dimension is based on relevant underlying specifications and buying considerations rather than a single headline feature.
Data Confidence is not another performance score. It tells you how much reliable information we had available when building the comparison. A product can score well while carrying lower confidence if some important specifications are missing or less clearly documented.
The Verity Score answers: “How does this product compare?” Data Confidence answers: “How complete and defensible is the information behind that comparison?”
Below you can see the current treadmill dataset as an example: individual Verity Scores, Data Confidence, the radar comparison and the score breakdown behind the shapes.
← Back to the GymVerity homepageThe homepage is now connected to our first researched treadmill dataset. These scores use the same six-dimension framework as the comparison engine; Data Confidence is shown separately.



FR30z leads on performance, comfort and features. Pegasus trades outright running performance for much stronger space efficiency and value. FR20z sits between those profiles as a balanced home-running option.
Open full treadmill comparison →The comparison page remains unpublished while GymVerity is under construction. It is configured with these same three products.
| Factor | Reebok FR20z | Reebok FR30z | JLL Pegasus |
|---|---|---|---|
| Verity Score | 80.4/100 | 84.4/100 | 76.1/100 |
| Performance | 8.4 | 9.4 | 6.6 |
| Space efficiency | 5.5 | 4.8 | 9.3 |
| Comfort & usability | 8.7 | 9.2 | 7.4 |
| Features & technology | 8.4 | 9.3 | 7.6 |
| Durability & support | 8.7 | 9.0 | 7.2 |
| Value | 8.2 | 7.7 | 9.0 |
| Data Confidence | 96% | 96% | 82% |
Affiliate commission is excluded from GymVerity scoring. Products remain drafts while the site is being prepared for launch.